The NFL Draft is an iconic event in the sporting calendar. College football is huge over in the United States and its popularity is growing on this side of the Atlantic Ocean. One of the main reasons for that is because of the success of the National Football League.

American football fans from all over the world enjoy watching the best draft prospects over the course of the college season and the NFL Combine gives supporters one final chance to scout the talent.

A few weeks later, the best players in the business are drafted into the NFL. However, it is important to remember that even if you are the 199th player selected; it doesn’t mean you can’t go on to become the best quarterback in NFL history.

With the 2020 NFL Draft edging closer, the Cincinnati Bengals are officially on the clock. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out who the Bengals are going to select with the first pick but you never know – the NFL Draft often throws up the odd surprise.

Joe Burrow

This year, a shock first pick looks unlikely though. Burrow has been touted as Cincinnati’s future franchise quarterback for some time now and the Bengals themselves have heaped praise on the Louisiana State University Tigers star.

The 2019 Heisman Trophy winner led LSU to a dominant success over the Clemson Tigers in the National Championship game in January, with Burrow recording five touchdown passes on a defining night for the 23-year-old.

Looking at the latest NFL betting odds, Burrow is a shoo-in for the first overall pick. Can he live up to the hype on the biggest stage of all? Only time will tell. In terms of potential, the sky really is the limit.

 

Chase Young

The most explosive defensive player in this year’s draft class, Young has the potential to mature into a household name in the NFL. He was dominant during his time at the Ohio State Buckeyes, recording 16.5 sacks in his final college season.

Young himself has stated that he is the best player in the 2020 NFL Draft and he certainly ticks all the right boxes to succeed at the top level. Should Cincinnati take Burrow, you’d have to think that the Washington Redskins pick Young.

Without a doubt, Young is a real prospect and his versatility and ability to play anywhere along the front seven is a major positive in his favour. Scheme isn’t a problem, he can adapt and will wreak havoc wherever he ends up.

Jeff Okudah

An elite cornerback is worth his weight in gold and Okudah should thrive in the National Football League. Teammate to Young at Ohio State, he more than held his own in one of college football’s top defensive units for the best part of three years.

He is undoubtedly the best cornerback declared for the 2020 NFL Draft, with an immense physique and mental toughness required to succeed at the position. In addition, many college football scouts believe he is already ‘NFL ready’.

Okudah has been heavily linked with the Detroit Lions and it wouldn’t be a huge first round NFL Draft shock if he went at number three.

 

Tua Tagovailoa

The second quarterback on this list, Tua was once regarded as the clear favourite for the first overall pick in the NFL Draft. Unfortunately, the Alabama quarterback dislocated his hip midway through the 2019 season and that has hindered his draft stock.

Tua was unbelievable throughout his college football career, throwing 87 touchdown passes to just 11 interceptions in three years. An added bonus is his mobility – Lamar Jackson’s impact in the running game could sway NFL head coaches…

Most NFL mock drafts have Tua going in the first round but teams will be wary of his latest injury. You could argue that he is a risky selection but Tua’s upside is so great that he is surely worth a punt.

Tua Tagovailoa
Photo credit: AP Photo / Vasha Hunt

Jerry Jeudy

Quite possibly the best wide receiver in college football, Jeudy could find himself going in the middle of the first round. The Alabama star is reliable and his route-running puts him at an advantage over his rivals at the position.

In some ways, he boasts traits similar to that of Cleveland Browns wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr. Without getting too carried away, Jeudy looks destined to enjoy a prolific career in the NFL – provided he has a suitable quarterback throwing him the ball.

Alabama teammate Henry Ruggs III deserves a token mention here as he is also likely to go in the early stages of the draft but Jeudy looks better suited to the NFL. With 24 touchdowns in his final 28 college games, he is incredibly dangerous.

 

*Credit for the main photo belongs to David J. Phillip / AP Photo*

March 5, 2020

By Alex McMahon

Alex McMahon Sport
Body

Alex is a sports betting tipster, specialising in Premier League football, the Champions League and horse racing.

He loves placing a weekly accumulator on the football at the weekend and dreams of landing the big winner that will take him back to Las Vegas.

As well as writing sports betting tips for 888sport since 2015, Alex has produced content for several international media companies, such as Goal.com and The SPORTBible. 
 

Alex McMahon
factcheck
Off
hidemainimage
show
Hide sidebar
show
Fullwidth Page
Off
News Article
Off

Premier League chief executive Richard Masters announced that a Netflix-style service will be available in the future. It had been an option when the latest television deal was discussed and may well be introduced in 2022.

Streaming sport isn’t an alien concept, though the route to providing fans with a Netflix-type platform isn’t simple for the Premier League because of the vast television contracts.

The balance between what’s best for fans and what generates the most revenue is hard to find and, invariably, it is the desire for more money that leads decisions in football. A subscription service could meet both needs.

Masters was cautious about committing to a target date, but he was clear that it’s something that is on the table.

He said, “I’m not saying it will happen in the next cycle or when it will happen but eventually the Premier League will move to a mix of direct consumer and media rights sales… It is impossible to say when that will be.”

Whatever shape it takes, whatever the cost, whatever the timescale, the media landscape is changing.

Television packages are becoming anachronistic, and the subscription model, as people use for documentaries, films and drama, is an inevitability for the Premier League.

The financial factors will likely be decisive, but this is a change that can benefit fans as much as the Premier League’s accountants.

Extra Programmes

Paying for a subscription could give fans more than match coverage. The NFL and NBA equivalents provide additional programmes, from analysis to documentaries and historic footage.

As effectively a new product, and a fresh revenue stream, the Premier League should view this as a different platform to provide fans with shows that they would otherwise not be able to access.

Perhaps the talk shows like Sky’s ‘The Debate’ are developed, perhaps the Premier League introduces different analysts away from the typical stable of ex-players.

The quality of mainstream football insight is a debate for another time, but as BT Sport have demonstrated with some excellent documentaries, a new producer in the market can only be beneficial.

There is room for so much more, for fans to have a wider range of options.

The Premier League has an enormous media bubble which spreads across every possible platform and niche. Adding to that might seem unnecessary, but this would be a platform with the resources to differentiate itself.

In theory, at least, it could introduce different pundits and debates that the Premier League so desperately needs.

Flexibility

Giving fans flexibility will be the key to any Premier League subscription model. American leagues give the option of tiers, allowing fans access to different number of games.

Considering the loyalty of football fans, and how many fans will be mainly interested in their team, the option to pay a lower fee just to watch their side’s matches is crucial if a Netflix-style Premier League service is to work.

On top of this, one-off fees for a match (much like pay-per-view boxing) should be considered. The choice to pay for only a handful of matches per month would help, too.

Fans need several subscriptions to watch even all their team’s matches. This could change that. While it won’t be what motivates the introduction, fans are set to have more choice about how much they shell out each month to watch football.

Rewatchability

Pausing live TV and recordings might make this seem minor, or even irrelevant, but that’s not going to be the case for everyone.

A dedicated app or website that stores all the games for the season, and maybe beyond, allows fans to re-watch full matches or a variety of highlight packages.

Avoiding the scores isn’t easy, particularly for those based in the United Kingdom. As British fans of American sports will know, however, time differences can make following teams abroad very challenging. An app like this can help massively.

The Premier League is truly worldwide. The fan bases in Asia, Africa and the Americas are every-bit as devoted as those in Europe.

An app will help those fans significantly, it might just make it that bit easier to watch matches as if they are live without having to sneakily check the score at work or stay up into the early hours.

Rewatchability won’t apply to everyone, nor is it revolutionary. For those it affects, though, it makes the league more accessible, and that can only be a good thing for fans and the Premier League itself.

Among the Premier League’s issues, including a lack of competition, interest is not one.


This Service Is The Future

Simply put, the Premier League has lagged behind for quite some time.

A streaming service has been an inevitable progression for the most-watched sports league in the world, and the only surprise with Masters’ comments was how long it has taken to reach this stage.

The demand is there, and the cost of television packages makes a Netflix-type option appealing to swathes of football fans.

It is long overdue. A salary cap in the Premier League isn’t coming any time soon, and the introduction of VAR has provoked more fury than acceptance.

A subscription service, hopefully offering extra content, might be the biggest change to England’s top flight in the next few years - barring major quotas following Brexit.

English football isn’t good with change. This one should be positive, though. It would be a landscape-altering move.

If done properly, it gives fans a chance to take control of their interaction with football coverage, avoiding the costly multiple subscriptions required at the moment.

The ‘if done properly’ part is the most important of all. A Premier League subscription service has the potential to be great, but like the implementation of VAR, it could be controversial and infuriating if poorly thought out.

*Credit for the main photo belongs to Rui Vieira / AP Photo*

March 4, 2020
Body

Sam is a sports tipster, specialising in the Premier League and Champions League.

He covers most sports, including cricket and Formula One. Sam particularly enjoys those on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean – notably MLB and NBA.

Watching, writing and talking about sports betting takes up most of his time, whether that is for a day out at T20 Finals Day or a long night of basketball.

Having been writing for several years, Sam has been working with 888Sport since 2016, contributing multiple articles per week to the blog.

Sam Cox
factcheck
Off
hidemainimage
show
Hide sidebar
show
Fullwidth Page
Off
News Article
Off

Once marketed as the ‘best league in the world’, the Premier League settles for using competitiveness as its unique selling point.

Compared to the year-on-year supremacy of Paris Saint Germain, the seemingly inevitable titles of Bayern Munich and the Clasico-centred dominance in Spain, the Premier League seems to be more competitive.

Competition has different forms, though. The anyone-can-beat-anybody line is peddled, as is the comparatively varied list of league title winners.

People’s motives for a ‘competitive’ league are different. Pure competition would mean the newly promoted sides had a very solid chance of lifting the trophy in May.

While that would be fun, it likely wouldn’t be popular with fans of the other 17 Premier League clubs.

Keeping any league, in any sport, legitimately competitive is key to retaining interest. The Premier League, by its promoters at least, is thought to be competitive, but there’s plenty to suggest otherwise.

Runaway Winners

Liverpool are miles clear. There was a title race in 2018/19, but Manchester City and Liverpool were so dominant, it was a peculiar end to the season.

City were 19 points clear in 2017/18. Antonio Conte’s Chelsea went on an early season run and never looked under pressure in the year before.

Even Leicester’s win in 2016 saw them end the campaign 10 points ahead of Arsenal, despite drawing three of their last five matches.

Title races have been rare events in the Premier League. If the elite of the division is where we define a league’s competitiveness, the Premier League fails that test.

The relegation contests and top four battles have been where the intrigued has lied in recent years. There’s VAR in the Premier League, which some hoped would see fewer decisions favouring the top teams.

There is, as we’ll come onto shortly, huge spending power among the top six clubs. Yet still, the league leaders run away into the distance more often than not.

Big gaps between teams occurs elsewhere, too. Sixth-placed Manchester United were 23 points clear of eighth-placed Southampton in 2016/17.

Fifth-placed Chelsea were 16 points ahead of seventh-placed Burnley in 2017/18. Last season was similar; Wolves were seventh, 13 points off Arsenal in fifth.

Financial Inequality

A Premier League salary cap isn’t close to becoming reality. A league with a television deal unmatched in world football, owners with more money than most can comprehend, is the home of sporting inequality.

As Spotrac’s payroll tracker shows, the difference in player wage spending in the Premier League is vast.

Wolves, with the 18th-biggest payroll, spend around a fifth of Manchester City and less than half of what Tottenham hand out to their players each year - Spurs are sixth overall and have a strict wage structure.

The Premier League had 11 of the 30 biggest clubs in the world by revenue per Deloitte’s 2020 list. That’s six more than Italy, and seven more than Spain and Germany.

Arsenal are the lowest of the top six in 11th – their revenue was over double of the next Premier League club, West Ham. Premier League clubs are wealthier than their European counterparts, but the difference between the top six and the rest is stark.

David Conn of the Guardian delved into the 2017/18 figures. West Brom had the joint-lowest revenue at £125 million, Everton were seventh-highest at £189 million. Sixth-highest Spurs were almost double that.

There’s a chasm between the top six and the rest. The Premier League just isn’t competitive off the pitch.

Limited Mobility

Leicester City can be used as an example of the upward mobility in the Premier League. Sheffield United, although less high-profile, are similar. Both represent freak events.

The root of the Premier League’s competitiveness issue – and this spreads across football worldwide – is financial power.

The super-rich have a very high floor, and the less wealthy clubs have a limited ceiling over a longer period. Manchester United have security that they are always going to be better than a certain level: Burnley do not have that.

The openings for Leicester in 2016 and Sheffield United in 2020 were largely down to subpar performances from the usual top six.

That doesn’t downplay their achievements, but those who have followed the Premier League are well aware that Leicester’s glorious title win was as much about the demise of the Manchester clubs and Chelsea as it was about Jamie Vardy’s sensational finishing, discovering N’Golo Kante and Riyad Mahrez turning into one of the league’s greatest bargains.

A league with such riches might share them better than La Liga, but the financial muscle of the non-top-six is incomparable to those who can throw hundreds of thousands per week at an ageing Alexis Sanchez.

That is a barrier to competitiveness. A barrier that, as a European Super League is mentioned with greater frequency, is becoming harder, not easier, to overcome.

Financial fair play has stopped owners giving teams a leg up as the wall to the top six has been built higher.

Investment that elevated Chelsea and Manchester City into the Champions League, that allowed them to attract the biggest names in the sport and win trophies, isn’t possible without facing FFP punishments.

The Premier League is competitive in its own way. The top six squabble among themselves – the group of top clubs is, in theory, bigger than elsewhere.

This year could be argued as a changing of the league’s dynamic, but turmoil at Arsenal and Tottenham, and whatever the situation is at Old Trafford, suggest this is a blip rather than the Premier League’s new normal. All three could yet finish in the top seven.

Resources at the top six mean they should be way better than the rest. When they aren’t it reflects a failing on their part.

Too often the Premier League is broken down into separate mini-leagues – a top six, a mid-table race for seventh and a relegation fight.

To call its competitiveness a myth is too strong. It is certainly overplayed, however, and as ever, it comes down to money.

*Credit for the main photo belongs to Jon Super / AP Photo*

March 3, 2020
Body

Sam is a sports tipster, specialising in the Premier League and Champions League.

He covers most sports, including cricket and Formula One. Sam particularly enjoys those on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean – notably MLB and NBA.

Watching, writing and talking about sports betting takes up most of his time, whether that is for a day out at T20 Finals Day or a long night of basketball.

Having been writing for several years, Sam has been working with 888Sport since 2016, contributing multiple articles per week to the blog.

Sam Cox
factcheck
Off
hidemainimage
show
Hide sidebar
show
Fullwidth Page
Off
News Article
Off